Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Daniel Laidler's avatar

Beautifully argued. I'd say there's a specific mechanism behind the mirage: hagioptasia - an evolved tendency to project specialness onto external things, making them shimmer with apparent promise. The function was never to deliver satisfaction, only to generate pursuit.

Contra-Psych's avatar

Love this and I agree with about 80% of it. The hedonic treadmill is real, the antisatisfiable nature of desire is brilliantly put, and the bullshit-protective armor framing is genuinely useful.

Where I'd push back is on the absolutism of "you will never be satisfied." Because I can genuinely look back across different periods of my life and identify sustained stretches where my overall level of happiness was markedly different. Not moment-to-moment satisfaction — you're right that that's a treadmill. But something more like a baseline. A sustained equilibrium that lasted months or years at a time.

And when I'm not in one of those periods, that baseline is exactly what I'm trying to get back to. Not some peak experience or fantasy of permanent bliss — just a way of living that I've already experienced and know is available to me.

Not saying it's easy. Not saying everyone can do it. And definitely not selling a course on it. But I think telling people they'll never be satisfied — however well-argued — risks becoming its own kind of bullshit if it convinces people to stop trying to build something that actually works.

44 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?