Thank you, there might be something going on with the psyarxiv website. I’ll change the links when I have a chance. In the meantime, you can easily find that paper by googling “Pinsof social paradoxes”
Have you read the book “The Myth of Left and Right” by Hyrum and Verlan Lewis? They make a similar argument.
They claim (and I agree) that a horizontal line ranging from far right to far left is not an accurate or useful way to model politics. First, politics is about many issues, not just one. Second, there is no real consistency across times and places in terms of which positions are considered right-wing and left-wing.
Instead of right and left representing philosophical essences they represent social tribes. People anchor into a tribe and adopt the beliefs on that side. The positions of each side are generally put together through building a coalition to win elections and sometimes even through historical happenstance. One example is when a republican president, Donald Trump, took a relaxed approach to Covid, perhaps because it was an election year and he wanted to keep the economy strong. Democrats responded by taking a strict approach to Covid and the battle lines were drawn.
Intellectuals and leaders on both sides will come up with stories that tie their side’s positions together and explain why they are the heroes and the other side are the villains. However, they are just stories.
The Lewis Brothers characterize their position as the social theory and contrast it with the opposing essential theory. The social position says that “right” and “left” have no enduring philosophical essence and that the bundling of positions we tend to see is due to social conformity. The essential theory opposes this and claims (depending on who is talking) various essences to left and right.
Yea I’ve read that book and am a fan. They make good arguments and I agree with them; in fact, their book came out around the same time as my academic paper on the topic and we independently converged on very similar ideas.
Yea, I definitely sympathize with this feeling. I've felt the same way many times. But it's worth remembering that we are living in the best, most peaceful time in human history. We have growing awareness of our flawed human nature (which I'm hoping to help spread). Most people are actually pretty apathetic about politics and alienated by the growing polarization. It only seems like politics is crazy because the craziest people are the most visible. Is anything perfect? No. Are some things better than others? Yes. Is there hope? At least a glimmer of it. My two cents, anyways. Thanks for reading.
hi, been enjoying all your post.
Just to let you know that many psyarxiv links that you used in multiple post have "too many redirects" error, e.g. https://psyarxiv.com/avh9t/
I am not sure if all are effected, but I have seen it many times when reading prior posts.
Hope you can look into them.
Thank you, there might be something going on with the psyarxiv website. I’ll change the links when I have a chance. In the meantime, you can easily find that paper by googling “Pinsof social paradoxes”
Have you read the book “The Myth of Left and Right” by Hyrum and Verlan Lewis? They make a similar argument.
They claim (and I agree) that a horizontal line ranging from far right to far left is not an accurate or useful way to model politics. First, politics is about many issues, not just one. Second, there is no real consistency across times and places in terms of which positions are considered right-wing and left-wing.
Instead of right and left representing philosophical essences they represent social tribes. People anchor into a tribe and adopt the beliefs on that side. The positions of each side are generally put together through building a coalition to win elections and sometimes even through historical happenstance. One example is when a republican president, Donald Trump, took a relaxed approach to Covid, perhaps because it was an election year and he wanted to keep the economy strong. Democrats responded by taking a strict approach to Covid and the battle lines were drawn.
Intellectuals and leaders on both sides will come up with stories that tie their side’s positions together and explain why they are the heroes and the other side are the villains. However, they are just stories.
The Lewis Brothers characterize their position as the social theory and contrast it with the opposing essential theory. The social position says that “right” and “left” have no enduring philosophical essence and that the bundling of positions we tend to see is due to social conformity. The essential theory opposes this and claims (depending on who is talking) various essences to left and right.
Yea I’ve read that book and am a fan. They make good arguments and I agree with them; in fact, their book came out around the same time as my academic paper on the topic and we independently converged on very similar ideas.
Yea, I definitely sympathize with this feeling. I've felt the same way many times. But it's worth remembering that we are living in the best, most peaceful time in human history. We have growing awareness of our flawed human nature (which I'm hoping to help spread). Most people are actually pretty apathetic about politics and alienated by the growing polarization. It only seems like politics is crazy because the craziest people are the most visible. Is anything perfect? No. Are some things better than others? Yes. Is there hope? At least a glimmer of it. My two cents, anyways. Thanks for reading.